The Catholic Church. Now brought to you by NAMBLA.

Now it's the nuns who can't keep their hands off young boys. What is going on here?

Comments

  1. It appears blatantly clear that the catholic clergy has always attracted person who were, for their time, sexually deviant. For many years, when homosexuality was "the love that dare not speak it's name" and other, more disparaging characterizations. It seemed that the son who was more sensitive would end up in a monastery, and live relatively happily, given society's intolerance of him, in a commune of similarly oriented men. When gayness became much less horrid to society, there was little need for gay men to enter the sham of priesthood - amazingly, gay men wish to feel some benefits of some degree of freedom, rather more than less like the rest of humans -- or at least humans who have experienced something resembling freedom or, more realistically, the goebellian repitition of some land of the free until we believe it just in the hopes of never having to hear it again. (By the way, when someone says freedom isn't free, accuse them of a nonsensical, plutocratic aphorism instead of an intelligent utterance suffering of poverty of content of meaning. Probably some sort of blow to the solar plexis would prove an appropriate punctuation mark to an intelligent reply. These are the same folks who say all too frequently, "Nobody ever said life was fair." Actually, civics teachers and whatnot in high school implied it strongly when they managed not to say it outright in their pro-citizenship (they were, the unamrried femaile teachers, such themselves, but did not mention the concept of wage slavery and that shorty after the War Between The States (which was not conceived as nor waged for the end of slavery - imagine some uneducated Irish worker becomeing suddenly willing to leave his job, his home, his whisky (if applicable) all the sever the black man from his shackles. I hardly buy that, particularly since no other part of the US has been less racist overall than the South, and a lot of that post-War idiot racism was due to carpetbaggers and occupying forces attempting to humiliate their just-defeated for by appointing completely uneducated ex-slaves as mayors and what have you -- this little salt in the wound, along with a few other venalities rendering the claim of valor on the part of the victors rather hollow if not as dishonest and purulent as anything W or the Pope might say of an anti-human sort - most of whatever it is they utter with but vague intelligibility. While Southerners, those who still lived, were atwitter at the insult of having persons unfit for any job in which the chore of reading and writing was a desideratum if not a necessity, the robber barons quietly took over the operation of the various industry-amenable farms, mills, mines, and factories and made off with the booty over which the War was actually fought - free and cheap materials and a virtually limitless wage slave work force; It is here, again, that the idea of a New Yorker of Irish descent wishing to free slaves again breaks apart. All he really needed, this New York laborer, was competition for jobs by people willing to take less than half the pay the Irishman receieved. It is now clear, princliples of human dignity, the US value of freedom, and so forth ad naus...infinitum, were worth all the sacrifice asked, up to and including his existance as one with brain wave activity here on the planet. Principle, as it is now, was, at that time paramount, and pro-robber baron activities were of quite minor consequence. Which brings us back to the priests being the repository for a number of centuries for homosexuals. And, as mentioned above, as the need for concealment grew less and less necessary (though a number of men are, for more personal and professional reasons than for the sake of their own shame, still safely esconced in well-appointed closets, this need, as the gay community reached the apotheosis of it's strength and has as a movement of sorts become rather superfluous, is making gay life more and more mainstream. It is unimaginable to me that anyone would oppose gay or lesbian marriages; insurance-based fiscal reasons are the only root of it I can think of, or the semantic fooforaw of "marriage" vs "civil union" would be laughable, rather like bad science fiction movies.

    That women, as we turn to nums, endured the same sort of thing as gay men - though their profile, as a whole, was much less prominent - were also attracted to the sisterhood, if they call it that, but at least if they were called to the num factory or nunnery or whatever, it was always the fickle, spinster-esque (regardless of her appearance) daughter who married god or jesus or for that matter and for all i know, mary, or perhaps ana...rosary beads and the pantheon of saints. (Everyone knows that that jet set bitch, Mother Teresa's sainthood was political and due to her knowing the right celbrities who had the ability to pressure the pedophile pope into granting her that honorarium amidst grand fanfare among the Aspen and New York catholic rich kids, for Teresa had told them more about sex in mildly deviant yet still pleasing forms than they would ever have learned, and caused them to wish to repay her in the coin of her realm. So she soon became "ill" and had to spend much time behind closed doors with nun nurses, and did not want for her sexual activity of choice, even though she had gone through, at different times, Sonny Bono, George Clooney, Sylvester Stallone, Madonna, Christopher Walken, and Marlon Brando - all as experiments to discern to the finest point her sexual needs, suppliable only by a lesbian nun, and an experienced one.

    As lesbianism became less of a headline maker, there came to be less marriages to the father or son or holy ghost - that must've been most unsatisfying as consummations go - or mary, the purported virgin eternal; of course she was, she except when god fucked her, she was as close to being a 100% lesbian as a spirit, person, mother of a saviour, can become, even though the creator of the universe had tapped dat. Wasn't so bad, she later said - but felt weird, his having a pendulous member that spramg at her like a cobra on steroids in order to create her "virgin birth" - what a cool scam. Her young'un didn't fair as well as he might've, though his reputation lives on and on and on and on. And on³.

    With lesbian nuns becoming less the rule (though assuredly not without a marked presence in the ranks of those nunnish), the newer crop of nuns, who were psychosocially underdeveloped, joined on up, hoping for a lifelong vow of silence due to their finding boys of their developmental, NOT chronological age to be the cats as partners. And though many had, like nurses drawn to MDs, enlisted in the nun brigade in order to snag a well-to-do priest, too many failed and turned into near-MILFs (they were older, enthusiastic women, but did not have the M in milf amongst thirs resumé items, being childless. Nevertheless, they did pull likely fellows out of classes for punishment in their offices and there eschewed the runler across the knuckles in favor of a spanking as he lay across her lap. Erelong, chronologically disparate people were making like bunnies, thes chiarscuro MILFs, as it were, and the too-guilty-even-to-talk-about it in the confessional, got themselves a good little club going, and later learned that what they had thought was their sole property, these strapping Notre Dame clucks to be. That this kind of thing was so widespread did of course, spell it's mear doom - the vatican never causes anything to cease entirely lest it beccome an untapped resource center yet untapped. So there is your history of nunneries, monasteries, violations of child-like trust, and propably thus far well over 100tons of sacred spermatazoon. What gives is what these folks conceal beneth their chaste suits.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It appears blatantly clear that the catholic clergy has always attracted person who were, for their time, sexually deviant. For many years, when homosexuality was "the love that dare not speak it's name" and other, more disparaging characterizations. It seemed that the son who was more sensitive would end up in a monastery, and live relatively happily, given society's intolerance of him, in a commune of similarly oriented men. When gayness became much less horrid to society, there was little need for gay men to enter the sham of priesthood - amazingly, gay men wish to feel some benefits of some degree of freedom, rather more than less like the rest of humans -- or at least humans who have experienced something resembling freedom or, more realistically, the goebellian repitition of some land of the free until we believe it just in the hopes of never having to hear it again. (By the way, when someone says freedom isn't free, accuse them of a nonsensical, plutocratic aphorism instead of an intelligent utterance suffering of poverty of content of meaning. Probably some sort of blow to the solar plexis would prove an appropriate punctuation mark to an intelligent reply. These are the same folks who say all too frequently, "Nobody ever said life was fair." Actually, civics teachers and whatnot in high school implied it strongly when they managed not to say it outright in their pro-citizenship (they were, the unamrried femaile teachers, such themselves, but did not mention the concept of wage slavery and that shorty after the War Between The States (which was not conceived as nor waged for the end of slavery - imagine some uneducated Irish worker becomeing suddenly willing to leave his job, his home, his whisky (if applicable) all the sever the black man from his shackles. I hardly buy that, particularly since no other part of the US has been less racist overall than the South, and a lot of that post-War idiot racism was due to carpetbaggers and occupying forces attempting to humiliate their just-defeated for by appointing completely uneducated ex-slaves as mayors and what have you -- this little salt in the wound, along with a few other venalities rendering the claim of valor on the part of the victors rather hollow if not as dishonest and purulent as anything W or the Pope might say of an anti-human sort - most of whatever it is they utter with but vague intelligibility. While Southerners, those who still lived, were atwitter at the insult of having persons unfit for any job in which the chore of reading and writing was a desideratum if not a necessity, the robber barons quietly took over the operation of the various industry-amenable farms, mills, mines, and factories and made off with the booty over which the War was actually fought - free and cheap materials and a virtually limitless wage slave work force; It is here, again, that the idea of a New Yorker of Irish descent wishing to free slaves again breaks apart. All he really needed, this New York laborer, was competition for jobs by people willing to take less than half the pay the Irishman receieved. It is now clear, princliples of human dignity, the US value of freedom, and so forth ad naus...infinitum, were worth all the sacrifice asked, up to and including his existance as one with brain wave activity here on the planet. Principle, as it is now, was, at that time paramount, and pro-robber baron activities were of quite minor consequence. Which brings us back to the priests being the repository for a number of centuries for homosexuals. And, as mentioned above, as the need for concealment grew less and less necessary (though a number of men are, for more personal and professional reasons than for the sake of their own shame, still safely esconced in well-appointed closets, this need, as the gay community reached the apotheosis of it's strength and has as a movement of sorts become rather superfluous, is making gay life more and more mainstream. It is unimaginable to me that anyone would oppose gay or lesbian marriages; insurance-based fiscal reasons are the only root of it I can think of, or the semantic fooforaw of "marriage" vs "civil union" would be laughable, rather like bad science fiction movies.

    That women, as we turn to nums, endured the same sort of thing as gay men - though their profile, as a whole, was much less prominent - were also attracted to the sisterhood, if they call it that, but at least if they were called to the num factory or nunnery or whatever, it was always the fickle, spinster-esque (regardless of her appearance) daughter who married god or jesus or for that matter and for all i know, mary, or perhaps ana...rosary beads and the pantheon of saints. (Everyone knows that that jet set bitch, Mother Teresa's sainthood was political and due to her knowing the right celbrities who had the ability to pressure the pedophile pope into granting her that honorarium amidst grand fanfare among the Aspen and New York catholic rich kids, for Teresa had told them more about sex in mildly deviant yet still pleasing forms than they would ever have learned, and caused them to wish to repay her in the coin of her realm. So she soon became "ill" and had to spend much time behind closed doors with nun nurses, and did not want for her sexual activity of choice, even though she had gone through, at different times, Sonny Bono, George Clooney, Sylvester Stallone, Madonna, Christopher Walken, and Marlon Brando - all as experiments to discern to the finest point her sexual needs, suppliable only by a lesbian nun, and an experienced one.

    As lesbianism became less of a headline maker, there came to be less marriages to the father or son or holy ghost - that must've been most unsatisfying as consummations go - or mary, the purported virgin eternal; of course she was, she except when god fucked her, she was as close to being a 100% lesbian as a spirit, person, mother of a saviour, can become, even though the creator of the universe had tapped dat. Wasn't so bad, she later said - but felt weird, his having a pendulous member that spramg at her like a cobra on steroids in order to create her "virgin birth" - what a cool scam. Her young'un didn't fair as well as he might've. though his reputation lives on and on and on and on. And on³.

    With lesbian nuns becoming less the rule (though assuredly not without a marked presence in the ranks of those nunnish), the newer crop of nuns, who were psychosocially underdeveloped, joined on up, hoping for a lifelong vow of silence due to their finding boys of their developmental, NOT chronological age to be the cats as partners. And though many had, like nurses drawn to MDs, enlisted in the nun brigade in order to snag a well-to-do priest, too many failed and turned into near-MILFs (they were older, enthusiastic women, but did not have the M in milf amongst thirs resumé items, being childless. Nevertheless, they did pull likely fellows out of classes for punishment in their offices and there eschewed the runler across the knuckles in favor of a spanking as he lay across her lap. Erelong, chronologically disparate people were making like bunnies, thes chiarscuro MILFs, as it were, and the too-guilty-even-to-talk-about it in the confessional, got themselves a good little club going, and later learned that what they had thought was their sole property, these strapping Notre Dame clucks to be. That this kind of thing was so widespread did of course, spell it's mear doom - the vatican never causes anything to cease entirely lest it beccome an untapped resource center yet untapped. So there is your history of nunneries, monasteries, violations of child-like trust, and propably thus far well over 100 tons of sacfed spermatazoon. What gives is what these folks conceal beneth their chaste suits.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It appears blatantly clear that the catholic clergy has always attracted person who were, for their time, sexually deviant. For many years, when homosexuality was "the love that dare not speak it's name" and other, more disparaging characterizations. It seemed that the son who was more sensitive would end up in a monastery, and live relatively happily, given society's intolerance of him, in a commune of similarly oriented men. When gayness became much less horrid to society, there was little need for gay men to enter the sham of priesthood - amazingly, gay men wish to feel some benefits of some degree of freedom, rather more than less like the rest of humans -- or at least humans who have experienced something resembling freedom or, more realistically, the goebellian repitition of some land of the free until we believe it just in the hopes of never having to hear it again. (By the way, when someone says freedom isn't free, accuse them of a nonsensical, plutocratic aphorism instead of an intelligent utterance suffering of poverty of content of meaning. Probably some sort of blow to the solar plexis would prove an appropriate punctuation mark to an intelligent reply. These are the same folks who say all too frequently, "Nobody ever said life was fair." Actually, civics teachers and whatnot in high school implied it strongly when they managed not to say it outright in their pro-citizenship (they were, the unamrried femaile teachers, such themselves, but did not mention the concept of wage slavery and that shorty after the War Between The States (which was not conceived as nor waged for the end of slavery - imagine some uneducated Irish worker becomeing suddenly willing to leave his job, his home, his whisky (if applicable) all the sever the black man from his shackles. I hardly buy that, particularly since no other part of the US has been less racist overall than the South, and a lot of that post-War idiot racism was due to carpetbaggers and occupying forces attempting to humiliate their just-defeated for by appointing completely uneducated ex-slaves as mayors and what have you -- this little salt in the wound, along with a few other venalities rendering the claim of valor on the part of the victors rather hollow if not as dishonest and purulent as anything W or the Pope might say of an anti-human sort - most of whatever it is they utter with but vague intelligibility. While Southerners, those who still lived, were atwitter at the insult of having persons unfit for any job in which the chore of reading and writing was a desideratum if not a necessity, the robber barons quietly took over the operation of the various industry-amenable farms, mills, mines, and factories and made off with the booty over which the War was actually fought - free and cheap materials and a virtually limitless wage slave work force; It is here, again, that the idea of a New Yorker of Irish descent wishing to free slaves again breaks apart. All he really needed, this New York laborer, was competition for jobs by people willing to take less than half the pay the Irishman receieved. It is now clear, princliples of human dignity, the US value of freedom, and so forth ad naus...infinitum, were worth all the sacrifice asked, up to and including his existance as one with brain wave activity here on the planet. Principle, as it is now, was, at that time paramount, and pro-robber baron activities were of quite minor consequence. Which brings us back to the priests being the repository for a number of centuries for homosexuals. And, as mentioned above, as the need for concealment grew less and less necessary (though a number of men are, for more personal and professional reasons than for the sake of their own shame, still safely esconced in well-appointed closets, this need, as the gay community reached the apotheosis of it's strength and has as a movement of sorts become rather superfluous, is making gay life more and more mainstream. It is unimaginable to me that anyone would oppose gay or lesbian marriages; insurance-based fiscal reasons are the only root of it I can think of, or the semantic fooforaw of "marriage" vs "civil union" would be laughable, rather like bad science fiction movies.

    That women, as we turn to nums, endured the same sort of thing as gay men - though their profile, as a whole, was much less prominent - were also attracted to the sisterhood, if they call it that, but at least if they were called to the num factory or nunnery or whatever, it was always the fickle, spinster-esque (regardless of her appearance) daughter who married god or jesus or for that matter and for all i know, mary, or perhaps ana...rosary beads and the pantheon of saints. (Everyone knows that that jet set bitch, Mother Teresa's sainthood was political and due to her knowing the right celbrities who had the ability to pressure the pedophile pope into granting her that honorarium amidst grand fanfare among the Aspen and New York catholic rich kids, for Teresa had told them more about sex in mildly deviant yet still pleasing forms than they would ever have learned, and caused them to wish to repay her in the coin of her realm. So she soon became "ill" and had to spend much time behind closed doors with nun nurses, and did not want for her sexual activity of choice, even though she had gone through, at different times, Sonny Bono, George Clooney, Sylvester Stallone, Madonna, Christopher Walken, and Marlon Brando - all as experiments to discern to the finest point her sexual needs, suppliable only by a lesbian nun, and an experienced one.

    As lesbianism became less of a headline maker, there came to be less marriages to the father or son or holy ghost - that must've been most unsatisfying as consummations go - or mary, the purported virgin eternal; of course she was, she except when god fucked her, she was as close to being a 100% lesbian as a spirit, person, mother of a saviour, can become, even though the creator of the universe had tapped dat. Wasn't so bad, she later said - but felt weird, his having a pendulous member that spramg at her like a cobra on steroids in order to create her "virgin birth" - what a cool scam. Her young'un didn't fair as well as he might've. though his reputation lives on and on and on and on. And on³.

    With lesbian nuns becoming less the rule (though assuredly not without a marked presence in the ranks of those nunnish), the newer crop of nuns, who were psychosocially underdeveloped, joined on up, hoping for a lifelong vow of silence due to their finding boys of their developmental, NOT chronological age to be the cats as partners. And though many had, like nurses drawn to MDs, enlisted in the nun brigade in order to snag a well-to-do priest, too many failed and turned into near-MILFs (they were older, enthusiastic women, but did not have the M in milf amongst thirs resumé items, being childless. Nevertheless, they did pull likely fellows out of classes for punishment in their offices and there eschewed the runler across the knuckles in favor of a spanking as he lay across her lap. Erelong, chronologically disparate people were making like bunnies, thes chiarscuro MILFs, as it were, and the too-guilty-even-to-talk-about it in the confessional, got themselves a good little club going, and later learned that what they had thought was their sole property, these strapping Notre Dame clucks to be. That this kind of thing was so widespread did of course, spell it's mear doom - the vatican never causes anything to cease entirely lest it beccome an untapped resource center yet untapped. So there is your history of nunneries, monasteries, violations of child-like trust, and propably thus far well over 100 tons of sacfed spermatazoon. What gives is what these folks conceal beneth their chaste suits.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment